I have always found the concept of “classroom participation” quite irritating, not least because of my introverted nature. Classroom participation has been something I have had to deal with since my Polytechnic days, though it was never really enforced in Singapore. In Australia, marks are given after every session, and you actually get to know how much.
During classes (or tutorials, as we call them here), whenever the tutor (or teacher) asks a question, I will hesitate to reply for I believe in thinking through what I want to say before saying it. By the time a well-structured answer comes to my mind, someone else would have beaten me to it, answering the question, though often not as well as I know I would have.
Over the tutorials, I found that my not being able to think quick enough was costing me plenty of participation marks. I hate losing marks for nothing, especially when I know the answer, and better than most at that. A strategy that I came up with to aid me in countering this was to prepare for the tutorials early on, anticipating questions that may be asked, and memorising key words and phrases that I might blurt out.
The key words and phrases that I memorise are not actually meant to answer the question, but rather to stall for time. I blurt them out first, automatically reciting whatever associated facts I have memorised, and all the while I’m thinking about the actual answer in the background. Believe me, this has worked. I have often managed to beat the more extraverted “say first think later” students to answers, which is a great achievement for someone as opposed to this type of extraverted behaviour as me.
Actually, I had always thought I was one of the few who had this problem, and never actually attributed this to introversion/extraversion before, until I read a book called Type Talk, by Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen.
Here’s the excerpt that made me realise that this aversion to “classroom participation” might not be local to me:
Classroom teachers unwittingly pressure Introverted students by announcing that ‘One-third of your grade will be based on classroom participation.’ Prior to such a statement, both Extraverts and Introverts are on a level playing field. But the moment that new realisation hits, the Extraverts have an advantage. When the teacher poses a question to the class, the Introvert responds by thinking, ‘I know the answer. I just need to get it in focus.’ The Extravert, meanwhile, says, ‘I know the answer. Let me start talking until it becomes clear,’ and then raises a hand — or, better yet, blurts something out, perhaps: ‘Well, let me see. I think that the answer to your question is…’ And plop, the answer becomes clear, just in the nick of time. A second Extravert inevitably repeats the answer in his own words — and there’s nothing more repugnant to a true Introvert than to say a third time something that’s already been said correctly once or twice; Introverts are not ones to waste words. (Extraverts, on the other hand, have advanced degrees in redundancy.) So, who do you think gets the better grade for ‘classroom participation’?
It’s important to understand that neither approach to answering a question is better than the other. Both are quite natural. The problem begins when we make judgements about these differing preferences by passing out grades, promotions, or other rewards.
I love to read and write. Professionally, data science, technology, and sales ops are my thing. In my non-professional life, I aspire quite simply to be a good person, and encourage others to do the same. For those who care, I test as INFJ/INTJ (55/45?) in the MBTI.