I was reading a book called The Blank Slate, by Steven Pinker. It’s a book discussing the Nature vs. Nurture theories. In the book, I came across a chapter that reminded me of a question I used to ask a few years back, when I was more or less actively reading the Holy Bible: Can feminists be Catholics?
The following passages are from The Blank Slate:
For millennia, the major theories of human nature have come from religion. The Judeo-Christian tradition, for example, offers explanations for much of the subject matter now studied by biology and psychology. Humans are made in the image of God and are unrelated to animals. Women are derivative of men and destined to be ruled by them.
The Judeo-Christian theory is based on events narrated in the Bible. We know that the human mind has nothing in common with the minds of animals because the Bible says that humans were created separately. We know that the design of women is based on the design of men because in the second telling of the creation of women Eve was fashioned from the rib of Adam. Human decisions cannot be the inevitable effects of some cause, we may surmise, because God held Adam and Eve responsible for eating the fruit of the tree of knowledge, implying that they could have chosen otherwise. Women are dominated by men as punishment for Eve’s disobedience, and men and women inherit the sinfulness of the first couple.
According to recent polls, 76 percent of Americans believe in the biblical account of creation, 79 percent believe that the miracles in the Bible actually took place, 76 percent believe in angels, the devil, and other immaterial souls[.]
But I believe Pinker may have wrote what he wrote in the hope of dismissing religion, as the following seems to indicate:
Politicians on the right embrace the religious theory explicitly, and no mainstream politican would dare contradict it in public. But the modern sciences of cosmology, geology, biology, and archaeology have made it impossible for a scientifically literate person to believe that the biblical story of creation actually took place. As a result, the Judeo-Christian theory of human nature is no longer explicitly avowed by most academics, journalists, social analysts, and other intellectually engaged people.
What is it then, which makes people believe? I would especially like to hear from those “intellectually engaged people” about this; and also from feminists who seem to gain no (practical) benefit from believing — as opposed to the men who can claim power over women through the rhetorical use of the Bible.
I love to read and write. Professionally, data science, technology, and sales ops are my thing. In my non-professional life, I aspire quite simply to be a good person, and encourage others to do the same. For those who care, I test as INFJ in the MBTI.