<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Fastest 2.4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://edonn.com/archives/2005/02/gold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://edonn.com/archives/2005/02/gold/</link>
	<description>Changing the World, One Word at a Time</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donn L.</title>
		<link>http://edonn.com/archives/2005/02/gold/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Donn L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I've since had less marked improvement on my 2.4. Haven't quite gotten my Gold for the IPPT, though my time has improved a little. My fastest time, taken about a month ago was 9:47, three seconds short of the elusive Gold.

I believe however, that the 9:45 limit is more of a psychological barrier than anything, and that with a little more training and slimming down, I'd hit 9:30 or below easily. Till further notice,

Donn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve since had less marked improvement on my 2.4. Haven&#8217;t quite gotten my Gold for the IPPT, though my time has improved a little. My fastest time, taken about a month ago was 9:47, three seconds short of the elusive Gold.</p>
<p>I believe however, that the 9:45 limit is more of a psychological barrier than anything, and that with a little more training and slimming down, I&#8217;d hit 9:30 or below easily. Till further notice,</p>
<p>Donn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
